0xCFP // RE:BOOT 2027

Technical cybersecurity topics only.
Prioritise talks with live code, demonstrations, proof of concepts, or practical walkthroughs.
Show how things work, not just what they are.
Avoid marketing, vendor pitches, AI-generated hype, or speculative "future of cybersecurity" talks.
No high-level thought leadership or motivational presentations without technical depth.
CTF write-ups are generally not accepted unless they introduce novel techniques, research, or practical lessons applicable to real-world security.
Share real-world cyber war stories, incident response experiences, or lessons learned from engagements.
Present research on hunting, detecting, or responding to real threats.
Reverse engineering or analysing real malware, implants, or attack tooling is encouraged.
Original research, novel attack techniques, and defensive innovations are highly encouraged.
Demonstrate offensive or defensive techniques responsibly and ethically.
Clearly explain the methodology, tools, and technical details behind your work.
Be prepared to answer technical questions from the audience.
Provide practical takeaways that attendees can apply after the event.

> 0x2a: talk_submissions

University cybersecurity clubs are prioritised.
Village activities should be interactive and allow attendees to participate or observe live demonstrations.
Bring your own hardware, equipment, tools, and materials required for your village.
Have a Final Year Project (FYP), research prototype, or cool security project? Bring it on.
Demonstrations should be relevant, up-to-date, and reflect current cybersecurity practices.
Showcase something fun, unique, hands-on, and memorable.
Open-source projects, custom tools, and original research are highly encouraged.
Commercial product sales or marketing-focused booths are not accepted.
Your village should be safe for attendees and not interfere with the venue or other participants.
Be prepared to explain your work and answer questions throughout the event.

> 0x3c: workshop_proposals

Double-blind · 0x3f reviewers · 0xcorrupt

Criteria: 0xoriginality · 0ximpact · 0xclarity

Panel 1: Aphez - NanoSec Asia co-founder

Panel 2: RempahRZ - Vulnerability Researcher

Panel 3: KeiEnd

> 0x4a: review_packet

Submission: 0xAUGUST · 2026

Notification: 0xNOVEMBER · 2026

Final: 0xDECEMBER · 2026

> 0x2a: timeline_corrupt